Hold onto your passports, folks, because a chilling prophecy from a Japanese manga artist, dubbed “the new Baba Vanga,” is sending ripples of fear—and a wave of flight cancellations—across the globe! This week, specifically July 5, 2025, is the date etched into a terrifying vision of a devastating tsunami, causing tourists to rethink their summer travel plans to Japan.

Ryo Tatsuki, the illustrator in question, isn’t just any artist; she’s garnered a spooky reputation for her allegedly accurate forecasts.

Much like the legendary Bulgarian mystic, Baba Vanga (who famously “predicted” everything from 9/11 to Brexit), Tatsuki has a track record that’s hard to ignore. She reportedly foretold Freddie Mercury’s death and even the massive Kobe earthquake in 1995. And here’s where it gets even more unsettling: she also penned a chilling vision of an “unknown virus” appearing in 2020, peaking in April, and then… “appearing again 10 years later.” Cue dramatic music for 2030.

Now, her most recent and alarming vision: the ocean south of Japan “boiling,” leading to a catastrophic tsunami. The date? This very week!

Tourist Tremors: Cancellations Skyrocket!

It seems the fear is palpable. NDTV reports a staggering 83% drop in flight bookings to Japan, and Bloomberg Intelligence suggests bookings from Hong Kong alone for late June and early July have plummeted by the same terrifying percentage. People aren’t just reading about it; they’re acting on it.

Japan, due to its geographical location, is no stranger to the threat of earthquakes and tsunamis. But this isn’t just a general concern; it’s a specific date tied to a seer whose past predictions have, unnervingly, hit their mark.

What Are the Experts Saying?

While the world watches with bated breath, local authorities are trying to calm the storm of panic. Yoshihiro Murai, the governor of Miyagi prefecture, has stressed that tourism should not be affected by “unscientific rumors.” He wisely points out, “There is no reason to worry because the Japanese are not fleeing abroad… I hope people will ignore the rumours and visit.”

Yet, it’s a tough sell when visions of “boiling” oceans are circulating. As the clock ticks closer to July 5th, the world holds its breath, hoping this particular prophecy remains firmly in the realm of fiction.

Do you think there’s any truth to these kinds of predictions, or is it just a case of fear taking flight?

For months, Laura experienced bloating and fatigue, symptoms she, like many women, simply attributed to perimenopause. She was a busy mom of two, juggling life with her husband, Ben, and their sons, Jacob (17) and Theo (15). The idea of something more sinister rarely crossed her mind.

Then, one evening, a sudden, excruciating stomach pain struck, so severe Laura “could not move.” Rushed to A&E, she underwent emergency surgery to clear an obstruction in her bowel. The operation was a success, a moment of relief, quickly shattered by the biopsy results: Stage three bowel cancer.

The Fight, The Choice, The Gift

Laura bravely endured six months of chemotherapy. Initially, there was hope. “We got one clear scan in August and it all seemed promising,” Ben, 49, recalls, his voice tinged with the memory of that fleeting optimism. “But then in September we got the news that it was back and it had spread. That was absolutely gut-wrenching.”

Faced with a stark reality, Laura made an incredibly courageous decision two months ago: she chose to discontinue treatment. The chemotherapy was making her more ill, robbing her of precious time. Instead, she chose to live more fully, dedicating every remaining moment to her family and friends.

Supported by the compassionate care of St Christopher’s Hospice in Sydenham, Laura was able to spend her final two weeks at home, surrounded by love, in a “comfortable and dignified way.” Ben describes those days as a blessing, allowing them to truly cherish their last moments together. She then transitioned to in-hospice care, passing away peacefully on June 29th, with Ben by her side.

Finding Joy in the Face of Farewell

What makes Laura’s story so powerful is her extraordinary perspective. She openly shared how knowing she was going to die allowed her to live her final weeks as “some of the happiest days” of her life.

“As a society, we shy away from the process of dying,” Laura once reflected. “By doing that, we reinforce negative ideas around death. People think death is always going to be painful and traumatic, but it doesn’t have to be.”

Her candor is a profound gift. “Deep down we all know we are going to die. Cancer has forced me to acknowledge it. Since then I’ve lived more fully than I’ve ever done and that has been a gift.”

Ben echoes this sentiment, acknowledging the bittersweet blessing of their time. “Laura could have died on that operating table back in March. Life can be cut short unexpectedly and suddenly. But knowing Laura was going to die meant everyone had the opportunity to say what they wanted to say to her. Because I told her and so did the kids. Obviously, I’d prefer to keep her – and have her for the rest of my life. But she died knowing she is loved and that we will miss her endlessly. That is a blessing.”

A Legacy of Love and Openness

Throughout their unimaginable ordeal, Ben and Laura remained remarkably transparent with their sons, Jacob and Theo. “We’ve spoken very openly about it all the way through,” Ben shared. “We’ve always told them what the possible outcomes are – because we want to prepare them for what might happen and we want them to be able to trust what we’re saying. That’s definitely helped us throughout.”

Laura’s desire to help others cope with death and dying shines through. “I don’t think there’s been a day in this process where Laura truly let this get to her,” Ben said, speaking of her incredible resilience. “This is unfair. She’s had her life cut short by 40 or 50 years. But she was seeing the beauty in the small things – taking joy in what she could do. They say people are glass half empty or glass half full. Laura was always happy enough just to have a glass. She wanted to share that with people.”

In her final days, Laura thoughtfully crafted lasting memories for her family. She wrote heartfelt letters, curated precious keepsakes, and purchased meaningful watches for her sons, mirroring the one Ben gave her when they got engaged. “That way, on special occasions, like their weddings, they can look at it and know she’s with them and thought about that day,” Ben shared, a testament to her enduring love.

Ben’s final words paint a vivid picture of the woman he loved for 24 years. “They talk about love at first sight – and it was that. She’s been my constant companion ever since. Laura was generous to a fault – and the kind of person who is friends with someone after a minute of chatting to them. She was just a really, really nice person.”

Laura Dawson’s story reminds us that life is precious, that early symptom recognition is vital, and that even in the face of loss, there can be profound beauty, deep love, and an enduring legacy.

What aspects of Laura’s journey resonate most with you?

In a sunlit room, no cameras, no stage, just a piano and a microphone, Meghan Markle, dressed in Diana’s peaceful blue, delivered a promise never spoken aloud. She began to sing “Your Song”—the iconic Elton John ballad from Diana’s farewell.

In Montecito, Meghan Markle stood in a sunlit room, wearing a soft blue silk dress—the color so often worn by Diana when she sought peace. There was no stage, no cameras. Just a piano, a microphone, and a promise that had never been spoken aloud.

She began to sing “Your Song”—the Elton John classic that once bid farewell to Diana in 1997—but in her own way: slowed down, tender, like a whisper to the past. It wasn’t a replica. It was a reply. A memory reborn, reshaped by every word.

But this wasn’t a performance. It was a whisper to the past. Her unpolished, raw voice, full of longing, felt like a private conversation with the grandmother she never met, yet always felt. It wasn’t a tribute, it was a REPLY.

The navy netted hat

For her first Field of Remembrance event at London’s Westminster Abbey, The Duchess of Sussex seemingly drew inspiration from mother-in-law Princess Dianna. Sporting a very similar navy blue hat with navy blue netted detail as Diana did for the 1988 Armistice Service in Paris, the pair looked almost identical – especially as both paired their hats with matching navy blue coats and black leather gloves.

Princess Diana’s ring

Meghan proudly paid tribute to Diana on her wedding day, choosing to wear the Princess’ stunning emerald cut aquamarine ring to her evening reception at Frogmore House. The priceless jewel was likely to be a gift from Harry on their wedding day, and it looked absolutely beautiful paired with Meghan’s Stella McCartney halterneck gown.

Princess Diana’s butterfly earrings

On her first day of the Australasia autumn tour, Meghan paid a touching tribute to Diana by wearing her pretty butterfly earrings. Diana had donned them for her tour of Canada back in 1986. The earrings may well have been a gift from Harry on the news of his wife’s pregnancy. Meghan also accessorised with another piece of jewellery from the late Princess’ collection, wearing a gold bangle with blue stones.

A memory reborn.

This is the kind of profound connection we rarely see. And it’s not the first time Meghan has honored the People’s Princess. From her engagement ring, to her wedding bouquet (filled with Diana’s favorite forget-me-nots!), to subtle fashion nods and heartfelt words, Meghan has consistently kept Diana’s memory vibrantly alive.

WATCH BELOW to see this incredible, emotional moment, and then keep scrolling to see ALL the touching ways Meghan has paid tribute to Diana over the years! This is a story of love, legacy, and a bond that transcends time.

Melania Trump’s past visa history is EXPLODING online as Donald Trump ramps up deportation threats!

While Trump vows to crack down on immigration, even targeting figures like Elon Musk, critics are turning their attention to someone much closer to home: Melania Trump.

New scrutiny is being placed on how she entered the U.S. from Slovenia. Past investigations suggest she earned over $20,000 from modeling gigs in 1996 while on a tourist visa – which prohibits paid work! She only secured a proper work visa after these jobs.

Now, as Melania visits ICE facilities and praises their efforts, social media is boiling over with questions:

“Why wasn’t she deported?”

“Is this a double standard?”

“Did Donald Trump pull strings?”

The irony is not lost on many. Is this immigration crackdown about to backfire big time? What do YOU think?

STONE COLD SHOCKER: Melania Trump’s Visa Past Just Blew Up the Internet!

As Donald Trump pushes an aggressive deportation agenda, accusing even Elon Musk of immigration violations, a bombshell from his own home is dominating headlines: Melania Trump’s 1996 visa history.

Sources reveal Melania reportedly worked illegally on a tourist visa, earning over $20,000, before getting a proper work permit. Yes, you read that right.

Now, with Melania visiting ICE centers and praising their work, the internet is having a field day! Questions about “double standards” and “why wasn’t she deported?” are flooding social media.

Is this the ultimate political boomerang? Join the conversation!

Just days after the Amazon founder and Sánchez tied the knot in a lavish, star-studded ceremony in Venice, O’Donnell, 63, took to Instagram on Monday, June 30th, with an unfiltered critique that has quickly gone viral.

“The BEZOS wedding,” O’Donnell began her furious post. “It turned my stomach. Seeing all these billionaires. Gathering in the gross excess of it all. The show of it.”

But her criticism didn’t stop at the price tag. O’Donnell questioned the presence of A-list guests like Oprah Winfrey, the Kardashian-Jenner family, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Tom Brady, asking, “Is Oprah friends with Jeff Bezos? Really – how is that possible. He treats his employees with disdain. By any metric he is not a nice man.”

The former talk show host then turned her scathing attention directly to Lauren Sánchez, 55. In a shockingly blunt remark, O’Donnell labeled Sánchez a “fake fem bot wife,” contrasting her sharply with Bezos’ first wife, MacKenzie Scott, whom she praised as “the salt of the earth.” O’Donnell even posted “then and now” images of Sánchez alongside her comments, adding, “Who looks like that. Why would he choose her. After the salt of the earth Mackenzie.”

Rosie’s rant concluded with a biting spiritual assessment: “Sold his soul. Is what it looks like from here. The devil is smiling. At all his conquests,” before directing her nearly 700,000 followers to her Substack blog for more.

O’Donnell, who recently moved to Ireland, isn’t alone in her disdain. The Bezos-Sánchez nuptials have become a lightning rod for celebrity disapproval:

Charlize Theron threw major shade at her own charity event in Los Angeles. “I think we might be the only people who did not get an invite to the Bezos wedding,” Theron, 49, quipped, before adding, “But that’s OK because they suck and we’re cool.” She even reportedly added, “Yeah, f–k them,” while highlighting global issues over lavish parties.

Veteran journalist Katie Couric, 68, called Sánchez’s custom Dolce & Gabbana gown “tacky” in a scathing social media post, commenting, “Welcome to the eighties — when big hair and conspicuous consumption ruled. Apparently, tacky is back.”

Meanwhile, other celebrities like Mia Farrow and Olivia Munn used the wedding buzz to loudly champion MacKenzie Scott, 55, who walked away from her 2019 divorce with Bezos with an estimated $38 billion and has since pledged to give away at least half her wealth, reportedly donating $19.3 billion to over 1600 charitable organizations. “Truly incredible,” Munn commented on Farrow’s post praising Scott’s philanthropy.

The sheer scale of the $50 million wedding, coupled with Bezos’ vast wealth (estimated at over $200 billion) and criticism over Amazon’s labor practices, has clearly struck a nerve. The public’s reaction is mixed: while some defend the couple’s right to celebrate their love as they wish, others echo O’Donnell’s sentiment, viewing the opulence as tone-deaf in a world grappling with widespread economic hardship.

What do YOU think? Was Rosie O’Donnell out of line, or did she speak truth to power? Join the conversation below!

These aren’t your typical post-rain showers, nor are they a trick of light from a camera lens. These vibrant, horizontal arcs of color are a spectacular, albeit rare, atmospheric optical phenomenon. They form when sunlight passes through millions of tiny, plate-shaped ice crystals suspended in high-altitude cirrus clouds. When the sun is at a precise angle (at least 58 degrees above the horizon), these ice crystals act like prisms, splitting the light into a breathtaking spectrum of colors that appear almost aflame.

“It was like the sky opened up and showed us a glimpse of another dimension,” recounted one awe-struck witness who managed to snap a photo near a popular Rocky Mountain trail. “The colors were so vivid, so intense, it didn’t even look real. You just had to stop and stare.”

While scientifically known as circumhorizontal arcs, the nickname “Fire Rainbow” perfectly captures the stunning, fiery appearance of these cloud formations. They’re often mistaken for iridescent clouds, but circumhorizontal arcs have a distinct, horizontal band of color with red always at the top, a key identifier for this elusive spectacle.

Sightings are relatively uncommon, requiring a specific alignment of sun, high-altitude ice clouds, and a clear view. To catch one is truly a once-in-a-lifetime photo opportunity for many. And the Rocky Mountains, with their vast open skies and frequent cirrus cloud formations, provide the perfect canvas for such a magnificent display.

Forget your Instagram filters – nature just delivered the ultimate viral content. These incredible “Fire Rainbows” are a powerful reminder of the hidden wonders constantly unfolding above us. So next time you’re gazing at the sky, keep an eye out – you might just catch your own piece of this fiery magic!

The bombshell dropped after Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, reignited his scathing criticism of the President’s signature “One Big Beautiful Bill” – a massive tax and spending package making its way through Congress. Musk, a naturalized U.S. citizen born in South Africa, has branded the bill a “disgusting abomination” that would “destroy millions of jobs” and plunge America further into “debt slavery.”

President Trump, never one to back down from a fight, took to Truth Social, the social media platform he champions, to hit back hard. He accused Musk of being upset about the bill’s alleged rollback of green energy tax breaks, implying the billionaire’s opposition was motivated purely by financial self-interest.

But the President’s retaliation went far beyond mere online jabs. When questioned by reporters outside the White House, Trump mused, “I don’t know. We’ll have to take a look,” when asked if he would consider deporting Musk. He even hinted at unleashing the “DOGE” – presumably the Department of Government Efficiency, which Musk himself briefly headed – to “eat Elon” by scrutinizing the vast government subsidies his companies receive.

Is deportation even possible? Legal experts are weighing in, noting that while naturalized citizens rarely have their citizenship revoked, it can occur in “egregious cases” where citizenship was obtained through “concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation.” Reports have surfaced in the past questioning aspects of Musk’s early immigration to the U.S., which some legal observers suggest could potentially be grounds for review, though it would face an uphill legal battle.

This isn’t the first time the two moguls have clashed. Their “bromance” earlier this year, which saw Musk reportedly donate hundreds of millions to Trump’s 2024 campaign and serve as an advisor, spectacularly imploded in May over Musk’s initial critiques of the spending bill. However, this latest exchange is a stark departure, with the President explicitly targeting Musk’s very presence in the country.

Musk, for his part, has so far responded with a cryptic post on X, stating, “So tempting to escalate this. So, so tempting. But I will refrain for now.”

The dramatic spat has already sent tremors through the markets, with Tesla’s stock reportedly seeing a dip. Beyond the financial implications, this unprecedented presidential threat against a prominent American business leader has ignited a firestorm of debate over free speech, political influence, and the limits of executive power.

What’s next for the billionaire and the President? Will Musk truly face the threat of deportation? And how will this astonishing feud reshape the landscape of American politics and business? Stay tuned, because this story is far from over.

The drama unfolded with dizzying speed. Canada’s decision to levy a 3% DST on tech giants like Amazon, Meta, Google, Uber, and Airbnb, retroactively impacting profits from 2022 and potentially costing U.S. firms up to $2 billion, was set to take effect this Monday. But just as the clock ticked down to the deadline, President Trump unleashed a fiery tirade on Truth Social, threatening to terminate all trade discussions and impose new tariffs on Canadian goods within a week.

“We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country,” Trump thundered. His message left no room for doubt: “Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately.”

The stakes were astronomical. Last year, trade between the U.S. and Canada exceeded a staggering $762 billion. A full-blown trade freeze with America’s top trading partner would have sent shockwaves through both economies.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney initially responded with a measured tone, stating, “We’ll continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians.” However, behind the scenes, the pressure cooker was at its peak.

Then, in a stunning Sunday night reversal – just one day before the first tax payments were due – Canada announced it was rescinding the digital services tax. Prime Minister Carney confirmed the move was to allow negotiations with the U.S. to “make vital progress” towards a July 21, 2025 timeline set at this month’s G7 Leaders’ Summit in Kananaskis.

Canadian Minister of Finance and National Revenue Francois-Philippe Champagne echoed the sentiment, emphasizing that dropping the DST would “reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians” within a new economic and security relationship with the U.S.

While Canada framed the decision as a strategic move to facilitate broader trade talks, many observers are calling it a clear victory for Trump’s aggressive “America First” stance. The President didn’t shy away from claiming credit, using the moment to blast European nations for considering similar digital taxes. “They’re nasty people, and I don’t want them affecting U.S. companies. I don’t want that — if anybody’s going to affect a U.S. company, I want it to be us, and if they’re going to have to pay a penalty or fine, let it be to us.”

The rapid capitulation from Ottawa underscores the immense leverage the U.S. holds in trade negotiations, particularly under the Trump administration. While the immediate crisis has been averted, the episode highlights the fragility of international trade relations and the potential for a single policy decision to ignite a fierce cross-border battle.

The question now remains: will this newfound “peace” hold, or is this just the first skirmish in a much longer, more unpredictable global trade saga? Only time, and President Trump’s Truth Social feed, will tell.

For over 730 days, the entertainment world wondered: where is Sandra Bullock? The beloved actress, known for her magnetic charm and relatable persona, vanished from red carpets and film sets in March 2022 to prioritize her family. Now, as mid-2025 unfolds, Bullock has been spotted, subtle but undeniably present, in Beverly Hills, radiating the quiet strength fans adore.

But the real buzz isn’t just her public re-emergence. Sources close to the star are revealing that her upcoming project, the highly anticipated “Practical Magic 2” with Nicole Kidman, isn’t just a sequel – it’s a deeply meaningful creative rebirth. And that’s not all: whispers are growing that Bullock, who privately celebrated her 60th birthday, is “open to the possibility” of finding love again after a period of profound personal healing. This isn’t just about movies; it’s about a resilient woman reclaiming her life, one powerful step at a time.

The Witch Is Back! Sandra Bullock & Nicole Kidman Ignite “Practical Magic 2” Hype, But Her REAL Comeback Story Will Melt Your Heart

SPELLBOUND: The internet is officially losing its mind over the confirmation of “Practical Magic 2,” bringing back beloved witches Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman! But while fans are eager for the on-screen reunion, the true magic is in Bullock’s personal journey back from two years out of the spotlight. Her candid reasons for stepping away—and her quiet path to healing—are proving to be the most compelling story of her career.

It’s been the whispered wish of a generation: a “Practical Magic” sequel. Now, Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman are officially conjuring up their return, promising an enchanting follow-up to the 1998 cult classic. But for Sandra Bullock, this comeback is far more than just a film.

After a two-year hiatus to focus on “being in the place that makes me happiest” (her children and personal healing), Bullock, who recently turned 60, is re-entering public life with a quiet grace. While she’s “excited about the future” and “ready to play again” on screen, insiders reveal the true depth of her journey – a testament to resilience, quiet grieving, and a careful rebuilding of her life. This isn’t just a Hollywood comeback; it’s a profoundly human story of moving forward with quiet strength.

Sandra Bullock at 60: Why Her “Quiet Return” to Hollywood (and Dating?) Is Hollywood’s Most Important Story Right Now

THE RETURN OF THE QUEEN: Sandra Bullock, arguably one of Hollywood’s most private and beloved stars, is quietly re-entering the public eye at 60, signaling a profound personal and professional rebirth. After a two-year absence, she’s not just starring in “Practical Magic 2” – sources reveal she’s “open to the possibility” of dating again. This isn’t just a career move; it’s a powerful narrative of resilience, healing, and finding joy after profound change.

For two years, Sandra Bullock stepped completely out of the dazzling glare of Hollywood, choosing a deeply personal retreat. Now, in mid-2025, the whispers have turned into a quiet roar: America’s sweetheart is back. Photographed recently in Beverly Hills, a smiling Bullock radiated the poise and warmth that cemented her iconic status.

But her return is layered with deeper significance. While “Practical Magic 2” with Nicole Kidman is confirmed and highly anticipated, the real story lies in Bullock’s courage to rebuild her life after personal loss. Having devoted herself to her children and a period of intense healing, sources confirm she’s now “excited about the future” and, significantly, “open to the possibility” of finding companionship again. This isn’t a rushed comeback; it’s a testament to quiet strength, the power of family, and the profound beauty of starting anew.

EXCLUSIVE: The question on everyone’s mind has just been answered (sort of). Eric Trump, son of the current President, is openly weighing a future presidential bid, revealing a candid struggle with the “brutality” of politics – but also confirming that he’s not the only Trump eyeing the Oval Office. Get ready for a political shake-up, because the Trump dynasty might be far from over.

In a revealing interview with the Financial Times, Eric Trump, 41, didn’t shy away from the speculation surrounding the family’s political future after his father’s second term. While acknowledging the immense “emotional toll” and “billions” lost by the Trump Organization since his father entered politics, Eric dropped a bombshell: the family is indeed considering a continued presence on the presidential ballot.

“The real question is: do you want to drag your family into it?” he pondered, hinting at the personal cost. But then came the kicker: “If the answer was yes, I think I could do it—and to be honest, I think others in the family could, too.” He explicitly stated, “Time will tell. But there’s more than just me.” Who else is he talking about? The internet is already buzzing with speculation. This isn’t just about Eric; it’s about the very future of American political power.

Eric Trump’s “Billions Lost” Claim: Is This The Real Reason He’s Eyeing the White House?

SHOCKWAVE: Eric Trump just asserted that his family has lost billions due to his father’s presidency, a stunning claim that directly challenges widespread assumptions of political profit. But in the same breath, he’s hinting at a future White House run for himself—or another Trump. Is this a genuine grievance, a strategic play, or a sign of a new political era for the family?

For years, critics have argued that the Trump family financially benefited from their time in power. Now, Eric Trump is flipping the script. Speaking to the Financial Times, he declared, “If there’s one family that hasn’t made money from politics, it’s ours. Honestly, I think we would have had far more zeros attached to our name if my father had never gone into politics.” He cited “opportunity costs, legal expenses, and emotional toll” as staggering losses.

Yet, this candid revelation comes precisely as Eric suggests a potential future presidential bid for himself or other family members. The bold claim of financial sacrifice, juxtaposed with hints of a political dynasty, is igniting furious debate: Is this the ultimate deflection, or a strategic repositioning of the Trump brand for a new generation of political aspirations? The answer could shape the next decade of American politics.

The Next Trump President? Eric Trump Breaks Silence on Post-2029 Plans, Teases “More Than Just Me”

MUST-SEE: The biggest question in American politics just got a major hint: What happens to the Trump brand after Donald Trump’s presidency? Eric Trump is finally addressing the rumors, revealing a deep personal conflict about entering the political arena but explicitly not ruling out a future White House bid—for himself, or another surprising family member.

With Donald Trump now in his second term, all eyes are turning to the future of the powerful Trump name. Eric Trump, the often-behind-the-scenes son, has now spoken out, offering the clearest indication yet of the family’s political trajectory. While expressing profound hesitation about the personal toll politics has taken, saying, “Would I want my kids to go through what I’ve been through over the past decade?,” he also left the door wide open.

“If the answer was yes, I think I could do it—and to be honest, I think others in the family could, too,” he stated, adding a cryptic “But there’s more than just me.” This isn’t just a casual remark; it’s a strategic planting of a seed. The era of Trump in the White House may be extending beyond his father’s tenure, and the potential candidates might not be who you expect. The speculation machine is in overdrive.